Halton Region Prepared to Fight Province on New Developments
Published July 11, 2019 at 3:58 pm
Earlier this week (July 10, 2019), Halton Regional Council unanimousely supported a motion to eliminate the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT).
Earlier this week (July 10, 2019), Halton Regional Council unanimousely supported a motion to eliminate the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT). The motion was moved by both Burlington Mayor Marianne Meed Ward, and Halton Hills Mayor Rick Bonnette.
The motion, according to a recent blog post on Meed Ward’s website, was brought forward following the More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019 (Bill 108) being passed on June 6, 2019.
The motion is outlined below.
The blog post notes that the changes to the LPAT outlined in Bill 108 give the tribunal the power to make final planning decisions based on a subjective ‘best planning outcome approach as opposed to in accordance with municipal and provincial official plans.
Bill 108 also restricts third party appeals of plans of subdivisions to the applicant, municipality, minister, public body or prescribed list of people.
However, as noted in the blog post, that’s not all.
“Bill 108 takes local planning decision-making out of the hands of democratically elected municipal councils and puts it into the hands of a non-elected, unaccountable tribunal,” reads the blog post.
In addition, according to Meed Ward the LPAT adds costs and delays when it comes to delivering affordable housing, contrary to Bill 108.
It’s begun: the movement to eliminate Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (w/ resurrected Ontario Municipal Board rules). @RegionofHalton Council unanimously supports motion from myself & mayor @RickBonnette1 to eliminate LPAT; LPAT adds costs/delays to delivering affordable housing pic.twitter.com/8ESdibsj0h
— Marianne Meed Ward (@MariannMeedWard) July 10, 2019
As a result, it has been requested that the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing restore the changes made to the Planning Act that required the evaluation of appeals to be in accordance with provincial policies and plans.
It has also been requested for the Ontario government, in the long term, to eliminate the LPAT entirely.
This motion, as mentioned, is supported by the towns of Oakville, Milton, and Halton Hills.
I am pleased my @RegionofHalton @cityburlington @townofoakville @TownOfMilton @_HaltonHills colleagues are united in our voice to the Province to eliminate the LPAT. Also grateful for the compelling delegations from resident Gary Scobie & @burlington_we. https://t.co/h0FrESwZft pic.twitter.com/3ST4YLOOEo
— Marianne Meed Ward (@MariannMeedWard) July 10, 2019
Members of the Halton community have also expressed their support of the resolution of eliminate the LPAT.
We have submitted a written delegation for the July 10 Halton Regional council meeting, in support of the Motion by Burlington Mayor @MariannMeedWard and Halton Hills Mayor @RickBonnette1 on abolishing the LPAT. It is set out below. #BurlON #onpolihttps://t.co/75ntnwksCv
— WeLoveBurlington (@burlington_we) July 10, 2019
“Our previous efforts to reform the OMB that brought a measure of improvement have now been completely undone by this provincial government,” Meed Ward noted in another recent blog post. “It has now become clear that if the LPAT exists in any form, it is at risk of reverting back to an antiquated system and, as such, it needs to be eliminated completely.”
Meed Ward is also asking for other municipalities to pass similar resolutions.
When it comes to what the city of Burlington would like to see in place of the LPAT, Meed Ward provided the following statement.
“There is always a judicial review of a decision available, but the grounds of those are scoped under due process – there needs to be some subversion of law,” Meed Ward said. “That’s what other provinces have.”
Do you think the LPAT should be eliminated?
Photo is courtesy of Burlington Mayor Marianne Meed Ward’s website.
insauga's Editorial Standards and Policies advertising